If an object is constrained to move along a circular path, there must be a constraining agency that makes the object move along a circular path. This can be envisioned using the example shown in Figure 1, which shows an object moving along a circle or radius \(r\). At the moment shown, the object has a tangential velocity \(v\), and it has an acceleration that points to the centre of the circle - the centripetal acceleration \(a_c\). This constraining agency is a net force that acts on the object. In general, this force will have two components; a radial and a tangential one. If the tangential component of the force is zero then the motion is uniform circular motion, and if this component is non-zero, then the motion is called non-uniform circular motion.
The rotational velocity or angular velocity of the object as it goes around the circle is defined quite simply as the rate of change of angle with respect to time. Hence it is defined as:
\[ \omega = \frac{d\theta}{dt}, \label{eq:omega_def}\]
and this in turn has a straight-forward relationship with the tangential velcoity;
\[ v = \omega r. \label{eq:vomegar}\]
Thus for an object moving along a circle of a given radius, if the velocity is constant then it implies that the rotational velocity will likewise also be constant. This is the condition for uniform circular motion. In such a scenario the there is no tangential acceleration and the only acceleration that the object has is due to the centripetal force alone, and the centripetal acceleration is given by,
\[ a_c = \frac{v^2}{r} = r \omega^2.\label{eq:a_c}\]
Note that the direction of the centripetal acceleration is perpendicular to the tangential velocity, and therefore it does not change the magnitute of the velocity. However, if there is a tangential acceleration as well, then it has the effect of changing the magnitude of the tangential velocity. Tangential acceleration is defined as,
\[ a_\textrm{tan} = \frac{dv}{dt} = r \frac{d\omega}{dt}.\label{eq:a_tan}\]
The rate of change of the angular velocity (\(\omega\)) with respect to time is by definition the angular acceleration (\(\alpha\)), thus we can write:
\[ a_\textrm{tan} = r \alpha. \label{eq:atan2} \]
Thus when the angular acceleration is zero, then the tangential acceleration is zero and the object executes uniform circular motion, and if it is non-zero then the object executes non-uniform circular motion.
In today's lab you will be experimentally verifying the relationships given in Eqs. \eqref{eq:vomegar}, \eqref{eq:a_c} and \eqref{eq:atan2}.
If you would like to get a quick video refresher about non-uniform circular motion, see the following video.
For carrying out the experiment you will need the following equipment:
What you will be doing in the experiment is essentially shown in the video below:
This is the procedure to be followed:
After collecting the data you should have three graphs, one of acceleration vs time, another of the rotational velocity (\(\omega\)) vs time, and a third one showing the wheel velocity in the \(y-\)direction as a function of time. You data should look similar to that shown in Figure 4.
Zoom in on the plots as shown in Figure 5. If you look at the wheel velocity as a function of time, you will notice that the wheel decelerates at a more-or-less constant value - the decline in the velocity is linear. The iOLab device slows down gradually and comes to a stop as seen in the video above. In the exported csv files select a portion of the data from each file when the iOLab device gradually slows down - see for example the highlighted portion in Figure 5.
The following video shows how to select the data from the csv files:
Once you have extracted the data as shown in the video above be sure to save the data in a file.
The following video shows you how to analyse the data to confirm that the tangential velocity (\(v\)) is linearly proportional to the rotational velocity (\(\omega\)) and that the centripetal acceleration (\(a_c\)) is proportional to (\(\omega^2\)), and in each case, the constant of proportionality is \(r\); the radius of the circular path.
The video above will allow you to arrive at an experimentally inferred value for the radius of the circular path that the iOLab device moves along. Note this down. How does this compare with the radius of the circular path that you measured earlier, prior to giving the device a push? Once you have completed this analysis, you should be able to verify, within experimental error, Eqs. \eqref{eq:vomegar} and \eqref{eq:a_c}.
Finally, using the analysis tool on the iOLab data collection software, highlight the portion of the data that you exported; refer to Figure 5 above. Note down the slopes of the wheel velocity and the angular velocity; the slopes are the tangential acceleration (\(a_\textrm{tan}\)) and angular acceleration (\(\alpha\)), respectively. Divide the magnitude of the former by the magnitude of the latter and you should have another estimate for the radius (\(r\)) of the cicular path; see Eq. \eqref{eq:atan2} above. How does this compare with the two values you obtained earlier?
Make sure you include the following in your lab report: